Social Comparisons in Wage Delegation: Experimental Evidence
نویسندگان
چکیده
We make two contributions in this article. First, we examine whether social comparisons have behavioral effects on workers’ performance when a firm can choose workers’ wages or let them choose their own. Firms can delegate the wage decision to neither, one or both workers in the firm. We vary the information workers receive, finding that social comparisons concerning both wages and decision rights affect workers’ performance. In fact, the relative effect of discrimination in relation to decision rights is larger than in relation to wage. Our second contribution is methodological. We find that our treatment effects are present with both stated effort and a real-effort task, suggesting that both approaches may yield similar results in labor experiments. *Financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science (SEJ2010-17049/ECON; SEJ2009-11117/ECON), the Division of Social Sciences and the Department of Economics at UCSB, and Junta de Andalucía (P07-SEJ-02547; P07-SEJ-3261) is gratefully acknowledged.
منابع مشابه
Corruption as Betrayal : Experimental Evidence on Corruption Under Delegation
We consider corruption behavior in a three-players game : Principal, Agent, Corrupter. When the Principal chooses a fair wage, the Agent faces conflicting interests to reciprocate. This delegation effect is expected to lower the level of corruption as compared to what arises in two-players settings. We set up two experiments varying in the exogeneity of the delegation relationship. The experime...
متن کاملSocial Comparison and Performance: Experimental Evidence on the Fair Wage-Effort Hypothesis
Social Comparison and Performance: Experimental Evidence on the Fair Wage-Effort Hypothesis We investigate the impact of wage comparisons for worker productivity. We present three studies which all use three-person gift-exchange experiments. Consistent with Akerlof and Yellen’s (1990) fair wage-effort hypothesis we find that disadvantageous wage discrimination leads to lower efforts while advan...
متن کاملSocial Comparisons of Wage Increases and Job Satisfaction
Social Comparisons of Wage Increases and Job Satisfaction* We combine status quo and social comparison considerations and investigate whether relative wage increases in the sense of differences between individual wage increases and wage increases of comparable employees are related to managers’ job satisfaction. Using a panel data set of managers in the German chemical industry, we indeed find ...
متن کاملWage inequality and team production : An experimental analysis
Numerous survey studies report that human resource managers curb wage inequality with the intent to avoid detrimental effects on workers’ morale. However, there exists little controlled empirical evidence demonstrating that horizontal social comparisons and wage inequality have adverse effects on worker behavior. In this paper, we present data from a laboratory experiment that studies the impac...
متن کاملStrategic union delegation and incentives for merger
A unionized duopoly model to analyse how unions affect the incentives for merger is considered. It is found that both firms will merge if and only if unions are weak. However, once surplus-maximizing unions have the option to delegate the wage bargaining to wage-maximizing delegates (such as senior union members), both firms may have incentives to merge even if the union bargaining power is str...
متن کامل